Legal Opinion

Rapp v. Fred W. Hauger Motors Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1926No. Docket No. 5044PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff Francis T. Rapp brought this action in claim. and delivery to recover possession of an automobile or its value. He was denied the relief prayed for in his complaint and a judgment for damages in the sum of $1,500 was awarded against him and in favor of defendant J. A. Nougue, from whose possession the automobile in question had been taken and subsequently sold subject to the replevin proceedings. Plaintiff has appealed and urges as. principal ground for reversal that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings or the judgment.

At the time the transactions hereinafter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Carter v. RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Di Nola v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Powers v. Pacific Diesel Engine Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Washington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Barthelmess v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. Barney Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API