Legal Opinion
Parke v. Franciscus
California Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1924No. L. A. No. 7196PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This is an action in claim and delivery for the possession of one Buick automobile, motor No. 179804.
In April, 1920, Robert J. McNabb purchased and received possession of the Buick automobile from John Waterfield. A bill of sale was executed by Waterfield aud with, a registration certificate required by the Motor Vehicle Act (Stats. 1919, p. 191) was delivered to McNabb, who drew a draft in favor of Waterfield on the Coast Securities Company for the amount of the purchase price of the automobile. On May 10, 1920, McNabb sold this same automobile to J. D. Green, his employee, upon a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Venice v. Short Line Beach Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Boles v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Di Nola v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Briedwell v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Chucovich v. San Francisco Securities Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Safway Steel Products, Inc. v. LefeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Honeywell v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.