Smitton v. McCullough
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
—The plaintiff in this action sued to establish an equitable lien on certain personal property, alleged to have been created pursuant to the provisions of a parol agreement' of the parties thereto, and to have the same declared to be prior and paramount to other liens which had been imposed upon the same personal property. Briefly stated, the undisputed facts of the case as revealed by the pleadings 'and proof are these: In the month • of September, 1916, onq McCullough was indebted, for money loaned, to Smitton, -the plaintiff, in the sum of $20,125. During said month of September, 1916,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Ruggles v. CannedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Palmer v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- City of Los Angeles v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Forester v. StewardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.