Legal Opinion
Carter v. Rowley
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1922No. Civ. No. 3627PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an action to recover an automobile, or its value—alleged to be $600—together with damages for its detention. From a judgment in favor of defendant plaintiff appeals, contending that the uncontradicted evidence shows him to be entitled to the automobile and that the findings to the effect that he is neither the owner nor entitled to possession are not supported by the evidence.
Robert J. McNabb was engaged in the business of selling second-hand ears at Lamada Park, in Los Angeles County. Some time between the 16th and 20th of June, 1920, plaintiff left his car with McNabb for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walsh v. . Hartford Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Levi v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Wright v. SolomonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Griggs v. SeldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
- Heath v. StoddardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kenny v. ChristiansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Naftzger v. American Numismatic SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Gaine v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.