Di Nola v. Allison
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, C.
Action to quiet title.
Plaintiff's title is derived as follows: In 1892 the defendants D. E. Allison, B. R. Sackett, and James Barron were the owners of the land described in the complaint, and executed a mortgage thereon to Charles and Benjamin Golinsky. In 1893 the Golinskys brought an action for the foreclosure of this mortgage, in which they obtained judgment January 5, 1895, directing a sale of the lands in satisfaction of the mortgage debt. Under this judgment the land was sold August 24, 1895, to the plaintiffs in the action, and on March 3, 1896, they received a deed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wadhams v. Flagler GayIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- McJilton v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- Marks v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Reynolds v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Citibank, N. A. v. Data Lease Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.