Barthelmess v. Cavalier
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, J., pro tem.
Under the provisions of section 629 of the Code of Civil Procedure, when a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is made in the alternative—reserving the right to move for a new trial in case it is denied—the subsequent granting of a motion for a new trial cannot affect the right of appeal, given specifically by subdivision 2 of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure. We have such a situation here.
After the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff and against all the defendants except Gerald E. Arbuekle, the trial court granted the motion of appellants…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Jordan v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hubbert v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.