Legal Opinion
Pacific Finance Corp. v. Hendley
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1930No. Docket No. 3792PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
In this action to recover possession of two automobiles they were delivered to the plaintiff before trial, pursuant to the provisions of sections 509 to 514 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant Valley Investment Company for the return of the property or the value thereof, found by the court to be $2,500. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.
At the time of the transactions described herein the defendant Hendley was a retail dealer in automobiles at
Woodland. He ordered a number of automobiles from the Pacific Nash Motor Company, including the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Carter v. RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Bonestell v. Western Automotive Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Brunsdon v. BrunsdonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Rapp v. Fred W. Hauger Motors Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Washington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Guerin v. KirstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Commercial Credit Co. v. Barney Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.