Van Hoosear v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an order of the Railroad Commission for the resumption of water service. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
This is an original application to this court seeking to annul an order of the Railroad Commission made in a proceeding upon its own initiative, finding that the petitioner, Van Hoosear, was engaged in the business of supplying water to the public, had been charging rates not authorized by the commission, and had discontinued his service without the permission of the commission, and directing him to resume service and supply water at rates fixed by the order. There is no doubt as to the petitioner having engaged in the business of supplying water, or as to his having charged rates not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Pinney & Boyle Co. v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Associated Pipe Line Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Franscioni v. Soledad Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by24 opinions
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Frost v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Trask v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Inland Empire Rural Electrification, Inc. v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.