Legal Opinion

Trask v. Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1944No. Sac. 5587PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment quieting title in the plaintiff to “that certain water distributing system including the pipes, situate in the Modesto High School Tract now in the possession of defendants and formerly connected to wells and pumping plants located upon Lots 7 and 8 in Block ‘D’ and Lots 22 and 23 in Block ‘B’ of the Modesto High School Tract”; directing the defendants to “reconnect the said pipes and the said distributing system to the aforesaid wells and pumping plants in as nearly as possible the manner in which the same were at the time the defendants disconnected the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pine v. Gibraltar Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. California Water & Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hays v. VanekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API