Franscioni v. Soledad Land & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This appeal is from the judgment. It was taken within sixty days after entry thereof.
The complaint is in two counts. The first count, in brief, alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of forty acres of land, being lots 5 and 6 of block 3 of a subdivision of lot 3 of the Rancho Ex-Mission Soledad made by one McCray in 1895; that the defendant owns and operates a pumping-plant established' to obtain water to irrigate said subdivision, including the land of plaintiff; that the right to have water from said pumping-plant of defendant delivered by the defendant to said lots, on his demand, for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Farmer v. Ukiah Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Fellows v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Henrici v. South Feather Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Palermo L. W. Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Richardson v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.