Legal Opinion

Richfield Oil Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1960No. S. F. 20302, 20311; S. F. 20303, 20313PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

In these proceedings Richfield Oil Corporation, an oil and gas producer, and Southern California Edison Company, a public utility electrical corporation, attack two orders of the Public Utilities Commission determining that in respect to its gas operations Richfield is a public utility gas corporation subject to the jurisdiction of the commission and ordering it to cease and desist from delivering gas to Edison’s Mandalay steam-electric generating plant.

This controversy arose out of Edison’s wish to obtain and Richfield’s willingness to deliver a dependable supply of natural gas to be used as…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API