Richfield Oil Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
In these proceedings Richfield Oil Corporation, an oil and gas producer, and Southern California Edison Company, a public utility electrical corporation, attack two orders of the Public Utilities Commission determining that in respect to its gas operations Richfield is a public utility gas corporation subject to the jurisdiction of the commission and ordering it to cease and desist from delivering gas to Edison’s Mandalay steam-electric generating plant.
This controversy arose out of Edison’s wish to obtain and Richfield’s willingness to deliver a dependable supply of natural gas to be used as…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.