Pinney & Boyle Co. v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff is a corporation which in the conduct of its business uses electrical power to operate its machinery. Plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant to furnish electricity to be so used. Defendant is a public service corporation engaged, as its name implies, in furnishing gas and electricity to the inhabitants of the city of Los Angeles. During the life of this private contract between the parties litigant the city of Los Angeles regulated and prescribed the rates which defendant, with other public utilities, was permitted to charge for the electricity supplied and the service…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Seattle v. HurstWashington Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Great Northern Utilities Co. v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Payne v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.