Associated Pipe Line Co. v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
APPLICATIONS for Writs of Review to review and annul orders of the State Railroad Commission and its members. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
These are proceedings in certiorari whereby each of the petitioners seeks the review and annulment of an order made by the Railroad Commission, requiring them to file with said commission schedules of their rates and charges for the transportation of crude oil, petroleum and the products thereof, by means of pipe-lines from the San Joaquin Valley oil fields in the state of California, and their rules and regulations in connection with such transportation.
The proceeding initiated of its own motion by the commission, under and by virtue of chapter 327 of the Laws of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Frost v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Samuelson v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.