Legal Opinion

Frost v. Railroad Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 8473PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

Review to annul a decision and order of the respondent Commission commanding petitioners to desist from the transportation of property by autotruck over a regular route and between fixed termini upon the public highways of the state for compensation unless and until they shall obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity so to do from the respondent Commission. Petitioners were engaged in the transportation of citrus fruits belonging to the Redlands Orange Growers Association, a corporation, between the city of Redlands and Los Angeles harbor in this state, pursuant to a contract…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Estate of ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Morel v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Greeley Transportation Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API