Legal Opinion

Rossi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1988No. 16-84-06629; CA A41936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant, her automobile insurer, after it refused to pay a number of her claims arising out of an automobile accident. The trial court granted defendant’s motions to dismiss most of the “causes of action” in plaintiffs complaint and amended complaints on the ground that they failed to state facts sufficient to constitute claims. The principal basis for those rulings was that plaintiff alleged tort theories in the challenged claims, but only contract relief was available to her. Plaintiff also pleaded a breach of contract claim in which she sought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Employers' Fire Insurance v. Love It Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Porter v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Meadowbrook v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Wick v. Viking InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Butters v. The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API