Legal Opinion

Employers' Fire Insurance v. Love It Ice Cream Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 5, 1983No. A7906-02629; CA A21553PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff appeals and defendant cross-appeals from a judgment order entered in favor of defendant, a corporation engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of ice cream products. Plaintiff is defendant’s insurer under a fire insurance policy. This appeal arises out of a declaratory judgment action filed by plaintiff, alleging that defendant is not entitled to recover for a claimed fire loss, because it intentionally caused the fire and made intentional misrepresentations concerning the cause of the fire and the amount of the loss. Defendant raised three counterclaims: breach of contract,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Straube v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Moody v. Oregon Community Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API