Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Berg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 24, 1984No. 16-82-05225; CA A30414PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) brought this proceeding for a declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that the personal injury protection (PIP) coverage of its policy issued to defendant Miller does not afford benefits to defendant Berg or, if Berg is entitled to such benefits, plaintiffs obligation should be up to the limits of that coverage for only one accident, and any liability coverage benefits available to Berg under that policy should be reduced by any amount paid to her as personal injury protection benefits. Berg’s answer asserted that she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Nelson v. Iowa Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stoddard v. "Aid" InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kantola v. State Farm InsuranceAshtabula Municipal Court · 1979
  5. Porter v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marcilionis v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. MacKie v. Unigard Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Jones v. Salem HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. DeStefano v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. Workman v. Rajneesh Foundation InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API