Legal Opinion

Porter v. Utah Home Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1982No. A8105-02933 CA A22609PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment authorizing the “stacking” of statutorily mandated personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, ORS 743.810, provided by the automobile liability insurance coverage of defendant and another insurer. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the dismissal of her claim for consequential and punitive damages. We affirm.

The parties have submitted an agreed narrative statement of facts pursuant to ORAP 6.50. On July 1, 1980, Sandoval, plaintiffs decedent, was injured in an automobile accident that resulted in his death. Sandoval’s medical expenses exceeded $10,000, and funeral…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Turman v. Central Billing Bureau, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Employers' Fire Insurance v. Love It Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Milcarek v. Nationwide Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Kiem to v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API