Legal Opinion

Wick v. Viking Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1990No. 88-3487-L-1; CA A63868PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs are the insureds of defendant automobile insurer. They appeal, and defendant cross-appeals, from the trial court’s denial of costs and attorney fees under ORS 742.0611 in a declaratory judgment action arising out of a dispute over the amount of underinsured motorist payments that plaintiffs are entitled to receive. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

Plaintiffs were injured in an accident with an under-insured driver. They received a total of $21,000 from the other driver’s insurer. After plaintiffs failed to reach agreement with defendant, they brought this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. PlummerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rogerson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Rossi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Selective Services, Inc. v. AAA Liquidating & Auction Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Burns v. American Family Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Triangle Holdings, II, LLC v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API