Legal Opinion

Meadowbrook v. Groves

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1982No. 113388, CA 19602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs moved the trial court for voluntary dismissal of their action. ORCP 54A(2). They appeal from the resulting judgment dismissing their complaint without prejudice and awarding costs and attorney fees to defendants. Before the record on appeal was transmitted to us, defendants moved this court to dismiss the appeal on the ground, inter alia, that the trial court’s order is not appealable. We denied the motion with leave to renew. We now conclude that only the portion of the judgment awarding costs and attorney fees is reviewable. We affirm that award.

The relevant procedural events can…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Farris v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Steenson v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sackett v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Portland Trading Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woods v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Paddack v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rossi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Amvesco, Inc. v. Key Title Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Paddack v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API