Legal Opinion

Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 2, 1992No. 9006-03887; CA A69831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff insured appeals from a summary judgment for defendant insurer in this action for intentional interference with business relationships arising from defendant’s denial of plaintiffs insurance claim and the resulting litigation. See Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (A71495), 116 Or App 595, 842 P2d 445 (1992). The evidence on which plaintiff relies to create a material question of fact about the existence of an improper motive or improper means has no tendency to show either. See Rossi v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co., 90 Or App 589, 752 P2d 1298, rev den 306 Or 414 (1988).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Rossi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Largent v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API