Legal Opinion
Bond v. Abbott Laboratories
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 8, 1998No. 1:95-cv-02755PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
On April 6, 1998, Defendant Abbott Laboratories filed for summary judgment in this class action brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. [Doc. 92]. The defendant employer argues it is entitled to judgment because the two named plaintiffs, Calvin Bond and Cathy Bishop, did not have a serious health condition before the defendant suspended Bishop and terminated Bond for absenteeism.
On August 14, 1997, the defendant also filed a motion to dismiss as moot a class claim for injunctive relief [Doc. 72], Defendant argues…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morgan v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Jane M. Wooldridge v. Marlene Industries Corporation and Russell Sportswear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Gerald C. Woythal v. Tex-Tenn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Brannon v. OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Deloatch v. Harris Teeter, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bradley v. Mary Rutan Hospital Assoc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Hayduk v. City of JohnstownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Taylor v. AUTOZONERS, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Woodman v. Miesel Sysco Food Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.