Legal Opinion
Taylor v. AUTOZONERS, LLC
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided February 11, 2010No. 08-1278PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING CASE
J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On November 12, 2008, the Plaintiff, Karen Taylor, initiated this action against the Defendant, AutoZoners, LLC (“AutoZoners”), alleging violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. (the “FMLA”) and retaliation for filing a workers compensation claim. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment relative to the FMLA claim, pursuant to Rule 56 of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Deborah Hansler v. Lehigh Valley Hospital NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Rush v. E.I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Adams v. WallensteinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Barger v. Jackson, Tennessee Hospital Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Deborah Hansler v. Lehigh Valley Hospital NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.