Legal Opinion
Hayduk v. City of Johnstown
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 2008No. Civil Action 3:2005-294PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge.
I. SYNOPSIS
The above-captioned matter is before the Court on the Parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff claims that Defendants interfered with his rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act by failing to advise him of his rights under the Act, failing to offer him leave under the Act, terminating him as a result of absences he claims were protected by the Act and, post-termination, refusing to provide him leave under the Act and to rehire him. He seeks recovery under the remedial provisions of the Act itself as well…
2Cases cited125 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Haybarger v. Lawrence County Adult Probation & ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Bosse v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Saavedra v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Greene v. YRC, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Macintyre v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.