Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Mary Rutan Hospital Assoc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 28, 2004No. 2:02-cv-00797PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on several motions. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, although Plaintiffs, Carol Bradley’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Bradley”), Motion is on the issue of liability only. 1 Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Strike Portions of an Affidavit of Timothy Froebe, which was filed in support of Defendant’s, Mary Rutan Hospital Association’s (“Defendant” or “Mary Rutan”), Motion for Summary Judgement. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and DENIES the parties’…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wysong v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Groening v. Glen Lake Cmty. Sch.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Capps v. Mondelez Global LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Dage v. Time Warner CableDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  5. Taylor v. AUTOZONERS, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API