Legal Opinion
Woodman v. Miesel Sysco Food Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 2003No. Docket 226001PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Defendants appeal as of right the order of the circuit court granting summary disposition in favor of plaintiff on his claim alleging a violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 USC 2611 et seq., awarding plaintiff back pay damages of $59,331.94, and reinstating plaintiff to his job as a track driver. Plaintiff cross appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in denying his request for liquidated damages and in concluding he was not discharged in retaliation for asserting his rights under the FMLA. We affirm.
i
On October 9, 1995, plaintiff, a track driver who delivered…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Michael Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Mora v. Chem-Tronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1998
- Charles M. Brohm, M.D. v. Jh Properties, Inc., Doing Business as Jewish Hospital of Shelbyville, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Johnson v. KmartDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.