Legal Opinion
Page v. Page
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1962No. Civ. 25316PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *
Defendant appeals from the judgment rendered below, in a declaratory relief action, wherein it was determined that Mission Linen Supply of Santa Cruz was a partnership at will, and that as such partnership it could be dissolved by the express will of any partner upon notice to the other partners.
The testimony reveals that George B. Page and appellant are brothers. About January 1945 the two brothers and re spondent Montgomery, an attorney at law, entered into a partnership for the conduct of a linen supply business in the city of Santa Cruz, California. There was never…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Estate of BoyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Baird v. HodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Ades v. BrushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- County of San Mateo v. BartoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. Kimberly S.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Greene v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Schweitzer v. Westminster Investment Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Olson v. ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Estate of ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.