Legal Opinion

Schweitzer v. Westminster Investment Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 2007No. D049589, D049616PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

The Home Equity Sales Contracts Act (Civ. Code, § 1695 et seq.; HESC) 1 was enacted to protect homeowners faced with mortgage foreclosure proceedings from being victimized by persons employing oral and written misrepresentations, intimidation, and other unreasonable commercial practices to induce the homeowners to sell their homes for a fraction of their fair market values and lose the equity in the homes. (Boquilon v. Beckwith (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1697, 1709 [57 Cal.Rptr.2d 503].) In 1990, the Legislature amended the HESC to add sections 1695.15 through 1695.17, which (1)…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Video Software Dealers Association v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Boston v. Penny Lane Centers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Mission Springs Water District v. VerjilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People Ex Rel. Brown v. iMERGENT, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Nisei Farmers League v. Cal. Labor & Workforce Dev. Agency, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API