Legal Opinion
County of San Mateo v. Bartole
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 7, 1960No. Civ. 18862; Civ. 19172PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUAYLE, J. pro tem. *
These two actions have been consolidated for disposition on appeal. Plaintiff, County of San Mateo, filed both actions to acquire property in Bedwood City by proceedings in eminent domain. Answers denied that the taking was for a public purpose. The cases were consolidated for trial of the special defenses, and on hearing thereof judgments on the pleadings were entered in favor of plaintiff. The cases were then separately tried on the issue of valuation of the property taken and damages to defendants were fixed by jury verdicts. By way of a settled statement, these…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Swartzman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Midway Orchards v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Miller v. Mountain View Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Hospital Council of Northern California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.