Legal Opinion
Estate of Foreman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1969No. Civ. 33333PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from the judgment and decree confirming the sale of the partnership interest of decedent Robert G. Foreman 1 and the refusal to remove the co-executors of his estate. 2
For purposes of ready identification of the persons hereinafter named, Robert G-. Foreman will be referred to as Robert. June Tybus and Frank Tybus will be referred to as June and Frank, respectively. Appellant Kathleen L. Foreman, decedent’s surviving spouse, will be referred to as Kathleen.
As stated in appellant’s opening brief and concurred in by respondents, Robert, June and Frank formed a partnership in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Constans v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Gardiner v. GaitherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Burrow v. TimmsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Greene v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Estate of Garnier v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- American States Insurance Company v. Alexis BorborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Armuress Sapp v. Rogers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Flournoy v. BielecCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Anderson Hay and Grain Co. v. DunnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.