Legal Opinion

Greene v. Brooks

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1965No. Civ. 22082PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylob, J.

— This is an appeal by defendants, Bobert and Mary Brooks, from an interlocutory decree declaring the dissolution of their former partnership with respondents, Philip and Myrtle Greene, and ordering the sale and equitable distribution of partnership assets. Appellants contend that the judgment in favor of respondents must be reversed because: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the court’s finding that the parties had been associated as partners; (2) the court erroneously concluded that the prior municipal court judgment in respondents’ action No. 17799 was res judicata as to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Constans v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Denning v. TaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hastings Associates, Inc. v. Local 369 Building Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Billups v. TiernanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Wroblewski v. BrucherDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API