Baird v. Hodson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCABE, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiffs brought an action for specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of certain real property owned by defendant. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs. From this judgment and from an order denying the motion for new trial, the defendant appeals.
The real property, subject of the action, had been purchased by defendant approximately two years before he entered into the agreement with plaintiffs, at a price of $16,000. During the period of two years no improvements were made on the property. The agreement between plaintiffs and defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Johnson v. GlassleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Wm. Eckelmann, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Frank v. GiesyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by34 opinions
- Barnhouse v. City of PinoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Union Oil Co. v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Dell'Orto v. Dell'OrtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.