First Nat. Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank of Hobart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PER CTTRIAM.
The parties will he referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.
The facts in this case are few and simple and the decisive cuestión involved is one of law rather than fact. It appears from the record that, in August, 1927, the p'aintiff, City Guaranty Bank of Hobart, commenced this action in the district court of Kiowa county against one W. C. Scarberry, defendant, to recover on .certain promissory notes. Personal service of summons was made on the defendant in Kiowa county. The defendant failed to appear or answer, and thereafter, on November 2, 1928, a default…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abernathy v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- State Consolidated Publishing Co. v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Ray v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Brooks v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Barton v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- La Bellman v. Gleason & Sanders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Keota Mills & Elevator v. GambleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Charles Banfield Company v. State Ex Rel. FallisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- First Mustang State Bank v. Garland Bloodworth, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.