Legal Opinion

State Consolidated Publishing Co. v. Hill

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1931No. Civil No. 3028PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Appellee Hill has filed a motion for rehearing in which he says onr decision “is apparently based upon a misapprehension of the record, particularly with reference to the issues presented by the pleadings and the theory upon which the case was tried in the lower court.”

Appellee is his own attorney, and in his motion we think has well demonstrated that his client has a very pugnacious, persistent, fearless, and zealous lawyer; also that the lawyer has a client who devoutly believes he is right in this litigation. Acting in this dual capacity, it is evident that the client’s zeal has entirely…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patty v. County of GreenleeArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wolfley v. Gila River Irrigation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Keyser v. ShuteArizona Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Chenoweth v. BudgeArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Davis v. DodsonArizona Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Word v. Motorola, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wagner v. Coronet HotelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Sherman v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API