Legal Opinion
London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. Courtney
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1939No. 1814PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
An action was commenced in the District Court of Canadian County, Oklahoma,. *279by Lucile A. Courtney, plaintiff, against R. G. Courtney, defendant, in which said plaintiff recovered a judgment against said defendant. Thereafter, on August 22, 1936, said plaintiff, proceeding under Sections 497, 500, 501, Oklahoma Statutes 1931, 12 Okl.St.Ann. §§ 847, 863, 864, caused a writ of garnishment to be issued, interrogatories being filed, and on August 25, 1936, order was issued by the clerk for same to be answered by appellant garnishee before September 10, 1936.
On September 8,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Stoll v. Hawkeye Casualty Co. Of Des Moines, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- E. A. Adriaenssens v. Allstate Insurance Company, Marie Epperson v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- MacH v. TRIPLE D SUPPLY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Drs. MacHt, Podore & Associates, Inc. v. GirtonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
- Western Medical Properties Corp. v. Denver Opportunity, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.