Keota Mills & Elevator v. Gamble
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.;
{1 This cause concerns an attempt to recover on a defaulted promissory note. The dispositive question presented is whether partial payment on the note extended the time within which to bring an action. The parties stipulated that the issue was whether the suit was time-barred by the five year limitation period of 12 0.98.1981 1 which was in effect in 1989 when the note was executed, or the six year limitation period of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 12A O0.S. Supp.1992 § 3-118(a),2 which became effective January 1, 1992.
T2 However, reliance on only these statutes fails to take…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Ernest J. Saviano and Margaret Saviano v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Gray v. HolmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KNIGHTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Dale K. Barker Co PC CPA Profit Sharing v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- STRICKLEN v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- First Bank & Trust v. MaynahonahCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.