Legal Opinion
Ray v. Paramore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1935No. 24161PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties to this action will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.
This is a proceeding supplemental to an execution to compel the satisfaction of a judgment by garnishment. The plaintiffs filed an affidavit on March 11, 1932, from which it appears that on February 20, 1932, II. R. Paramore and G. E. Henschen secured a judgment for the sum of $500, with interest and attorney’s fees, against Will Ray and Earl Russell in their individual capacity and as a copartnership. The affidavit states further:
“This affiant verily believes that Jack Ray is indebted to the defendants, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- West Florida Grocery Co. v. Teutonia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Jacobs v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Helms v. State Ex Rel. MifflinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- First Nat. Bank of Healdton v. HalbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by17 opinions
- Culie v. ArnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Yetta Freeman v. Bob HeimanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Payne v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- First Nat. Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.