Legal Opinion

Barton v. Spencer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1895PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from the District Court of Canadian County. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for defendants below. The plaintiffs bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dale, C. J.:

September 20, 1893, Barton Bros, filed a petition in the district court of Canadian county, against P. S. Kern, alleging that there was due upon account to the plaintiffs in said action, the sum of $370. At the same time the plaintiffs filed an affidavit of garnishment, wherein it. was alleged that one L. M. Spencer had in his possession and under his control and custody jDersonal property belonging to said P. S. Kern, and that said defendant had no other property exempt from execution sufficient to satisfy plaintiffs’ claim and demand, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brashear v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Focke, Wilkens & Lange & Scott v. Leon & BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Bigelow v. AndressIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Burlingame v. BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
  5. McGarry v. Lewis Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Conaway v. Co-Operative HomebuildersWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. First Nat. Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Fousek v. DeforestMontana Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API