Legal Opinion
Charles Banfield Company v. State Ex Rel. Fallis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 16, 1974No. 46430PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet title to certain real property located in Tulsa County.
The state had obtained final judgments in Tulsa County against plaintiffs and others in 9 cases involving appearance bond forfeitures. These judgments have been entered upon the judgment docket of the District Court of Tulsa County.
Plaintiffs alleged the judgment liens were no longer valid and subsisting liens because the judgments had become dormant pursuant to 12 O.S. 1971 § 735.
The case was submitted to the trial court on stipulated facts and the trial court entered judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. WeemsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Thomos v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- First Nat. Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Davidson v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of Bell-Levine v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. TidmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Chandler-Frates & Reitz v. KostichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Wheeler v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Chandler-Frates & Reitz v. KostichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.