Legal Opinion

Wood v. Pendola

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1934No. Sac. 4782PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff sued to quiet his title to an alleged appropriation right in the waters of Coyote Creek in Calaveras County, and for injunctive relief to enjoin the defendants’ interference with the right alleged. The defendants appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff based his right to recovery on a judgment for the plaintiff rendered on September 21, 1887, in an action commenced in the Superior Court in and for the County of Calaveras by Marinda Wood, the predecessor of the plaintiff, against Lorenzo Péndola, the defendants’ predecessor in interest, and which was affirmed on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Tulare Water Co. v. State Water CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Department of Public Works v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Lower Kings River Water Ditch Co. v. Kings River & Fresno Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Mojave River Irrigation District v. Superior Court of San Bernardino CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Meridian, Ltd. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API