Tulare Water Co. v. State Water Commission
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The petitioner, Tulare Water Company, appellant in these actions, applied to the State Water Commission for a permit to appropriate water of the Kern River for the purpose of irrigating agricultural lands.
The application was in due form and in conformity with the provisions of the act of 1913 creating a Water Commission and providing for the presenting and granting of petition to make such appropriations (Stats. 1913, p. 1012).
The application was denied without a hearing by the commissioners, and the petitioner thereupon instituted a proceeding in mandamus before the superior court of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. Superior CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Council of Glencoe v. People ex rel. OwenIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.