Department of Public Works v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondents from proceeding with the hearing and determination of a petition for a writ of review pending in the respondent court.
It is alleged in the petition that Frank and Carl Lang-ford, on the twelfth day of September, 1908, duly posted a notice of appropriation of the running water of the Klamath River to the extent of 500,000 inches, measured under a four-inch pressure (10,000 second-feet), and on the eighteenth day of the same month recorded a copy of the notice in the office of the recorder of Siskiyou County;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Quinchard v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Tulare Water Co. v. State Water CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.