Legal Opinion
Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided February 29, 1936No. L. A. 15471PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The 1933 session of the legislature of this state enacted a statute creating the Agricultural Prorate Commission. (Stats. 1933, p. 1969.) This act is frequently referred to in the briefs of counsel as the Prorate Act, and for the sake of brevity, we shall refer to it by that name or designation. In section 1 of the act is set forth the declaration of the legislature, which may properly be deemed as a statement of the reason and purpose of the legislature in the enactment of this statute. This section is as follows: “The unreasonable waste of agricultural wealth occasioned by the harvesting,…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.