Legal Opinion
City of Pasadena v. City of Alhambra
California Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1949No. L. A. No. 19610 In BankPublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*916GIBSON, C. J.
Plaintiff city, the chief producer of water from a 40 square mile alluvial-filled basin of ground water* known as the Raymond Basin Area, instituted this litigation to determine the ground water rights within the area and to enjoin an alleged annual overdraft in order to prevent eventual depletion of the supply. Pursuant to section 24 of the Water Commission Act, which was then in force (Stats. 1913, p. 1012, as amended, Deering’s Gen. Laws (1937), Act 9091; now Wat. Code, §§ 2000-2050), the trial court referred the matter to the Division of Water Resources of the Department of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.