Legal Opinion
Meridian, Ltd. v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1939No. Sac. 5088PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*429SHENK, J.
Two appeals are here for consideration. One is the appeal of the defendant, City and County of San Francisco. The other is an appeal by the plaintiff. By stipulation both are presented on a single record.
The action involves the rights of the city as an appropriator of water of the Tuolumne River in connection with its Hetch Hetchy project, and the rights of the plaintiff as a riparian owner and appropriator of water downstream from the works of the city.
The plaintiff commenced the action on May 31,1932, against the city and four other defendants: Turlock Irrigation District, Modesto…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Webster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.