Champlin v. Sargeant

*372OPINION

JONES, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 In this case we interpret and apply AR.S. § 13-4433(A) pertaining to pretrial witness interviews by defendants and their counsel.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to article 6, section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 8(b) of the Arizona Rules for Special Actions.

Facts and Procedural History

¶2 Defendant James M. Champlin, Jr., was charged with six counts of serious criminal misconduct: Counts I and IV, sexual conduct with a minor; Counts II, III and V, molestation of a child; and Count VI, public sexual indecency. Our review deals with four of those…