Legal Opinion

Mejak v. Granville

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2006No. CV-05-0299-PRPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 In Arizona, a person “offering or soliciting sexual conduct with another person knowing or having reason to know that the other person is a minor” can be charged with “luring a minor for sexual exploitation” (“luring”) under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-3554(A) (Supp.2003). “It is not a defense to a prosecution ... [for luring a minor if] the other person was a peace officer posing as a minor.” Id. § 13-3554(B).

¶ 2 This case requires us to decide whether luring is committed when the person solicited is an adult posing as a minor, but is not a peace…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. HarvillArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. HarrodArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Chronis v. SteinleArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re the Marriage of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API