Mejak v. Granville
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 In Arizona, a person “offering or soliciting sexual conduct with another person knowing or having reason to know that the other person is a minor” can be charged with “luring a minor for sexual exploitation” (“luring”) under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-3554(A) (Supp.2003). “It is not a defense to a prosecution ... [for luring a minor if] the other person was a peace officer posing as a minor.” Id. § 13-3554(B).
¶ 2 This case requires us to decide whether luring is committed when the person solicited is an adult posing as a minor, but is not a peace…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HarvillArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. HarrodArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Chronis v. SteinleArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re the Marriage of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.