Legal Opinion

State v. Tarango

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1996No. CR-95-0118-PRPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In affirming defendant’s sentence for a drug offense with two prior felonies, the court of appeals held that defendant would be parole eligible under former AR.S. § 13-604(D) after serving two-thirds of her sentence despite language in former AR.S. § 13-3408(D), which would have called for a flat time sentence if she had been sentenced as a first-time offender.

The opinion of the court of appeals in this case conflicts with an earlier opinion of that court which held that a defendant sentenced in a similar manner was not parole eligible under former…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hughes v. JorgensonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. State v. BoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API