State v. Tarango
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In affirming defendant’s sentence for a drug offense with two prior felonies, the court of appeals held that defendant would be parole eligible under former AR.S. § 13-604(D) after serving two-thirds of her sentence despite language in former AR.S. § 13-3408(D), which would have called for a flat time sentence if she had been sentenced as a first-time offender.
The opinion of the court of appeals in this case conflicts with an earlier opinion of that court which held that a defendant sentenced in a similar manner was not parole eligible under former…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Hughes v. JorgensonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. BoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.