Norgord v. State Ex Rel. Berning
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Judge.
¶ 1 The Pima County Superior Court (superior court) granted petitioner/appellee the state’s petition for special action and reversed a Tucson City Court magistrate’s order that had compelled a purported victim of indecent exposure to submit to a defense interview. The superior court concluded that indecent exposure is a “sexual offense” and, therefore, that it qualifies as a “criminal offense” under A.R.S. §§ 13-4401(6) and 13-4433(A) for victims’ rights purposes. Real party in interest/appellant David Norgord challenges that ruling, contending indecent exposure is a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.