Legal Opinion

J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2014No. CV-14-0085-PRPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice BALES,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 In a criminal case, a parent who exercises victims’ rights on behalf of a minor child is statutorily entitled to refuse a defense interview. We hold that the parent’s right to refuse an interview does not expire when the victim turns eighteen, but instead continues until the case ends.

I

¶ 2 Crime victims cannot “be compelled to submit to an interview ... that is conducted by the defendant, the defendant’s attorney or an agent of the defendant.” A.R.S. § 13-4433(A). A parent or legal guardian may “exercise all of the victims’ rights” on behalf of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. David Stambaugh v. Mark KillianArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. NavarroArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Fleming v. State Department of Public SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Linda Bell v. Ica/ Maricopa Cty/ Pinnacle RiskArizona Supreme Court · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API