J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice BALES,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 In a criminal case, a parent who exercises victims’ rights on behalf of a minor child is statutorily entitled to refuse a defense interview. We hold that the parent’s right to refuse an interview does not expire when the victim turns eighteen, but instead continues until the case ends.
I
¶ 2 Crime victims cannot “be compelled to submit to an interview ... that is conducted by the defendant, the defendant’s attorney or an agent of the defendant.” A.R.S. § 13-4433(A). A parent or legal guardian may “exercise all of the victims’ rights” on behalf of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- David Stambaugh v. Mark KillianArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. NavarroArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Fleming v. State Department of Public SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Linda Bell v. Ica/ Maricopa Cty/ Pinnacle RiskArizona Supreme Court · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.